Apache RTR 160 versus Pulsar 150 Twin Disc: Let's Compare the Best

When it comes to choosing between the Apache RTR 160 and the Pulsar 150 Twin Disc, it's essential to consider various factors such as engine performance, comfort, and fuel efficiency. As professional SEO experts, we will delve into the details to help you make an informed decision based on personal preferences and long-term usage.

Which Bike Outlasts the Other?

In the comparison between the Apache RTR 160 and the Pulsar 150, one key factor to consider is durability and longevity. The Apache RTR 160 often lasts longer than the Pulsar 150. This is largely due to the fact that the Apache's engine, while powerful and sporty, may lose some efficiency over time. On the other hand, the Pulsar 150, although it has DTS-i technology, experiences a gradual decline in engine performance after a few years.

City Riding: Pulsar 150 Is a Champion

For city riding, the Pulsar 150 shines. Being a seasoned motorbike owner of both models, I can confidently say that the Pulsar 150 is easier to control, handles traffic exceptionally well, and offers excellent pickup. Conversely, the Apache RTR 160 is more suited for open roads and stability, which can make it less effective in navigating urban environments.

Engine Performance and Sound Quality

The Apache RTR 160 is known for its powerful and stable engine, but it can be a bit too noisy and less refined than the Pulsar 150. On the other hand, the Pulsar 150's engine is buttery smooth and produces less noise. While the Apache RTR 160 may have a slight advantage in power and stability, the Pulsar 150’s engine performance does drop slightly after 4-5 years of usage, although this is less noticeable on the Apache.

Fuel Efficiency and Comfort

In terms of fuel efficiency, the Pulsar 150 edges out the Apache RTR 160 by a significant margin, providing an extra 3-5 km/l. This means that if you frequently find yourself in city traffic, the Pulsar 150 is a more economical choice. Moreover, the seating position of the Apache RTR 160 can be uncomfortable, leading to pain and exhaustion, especially in the back and hands. These issues are mitigated in the Pulsar 150, although some users report neck pain after long rides.

Braking and Suspension

Both bikes offer excellent braking performance. However, the gear shifting in the Pulsar 150 is smoother, although its gear sometimes automatically shifts to neutral from 1 or 2 gears. The Apache RTR 160, on the other hand, has a very stiff rear suspension, which can be one of the worst you can find in a bike. Its front suspension is also less than ideal.

The Pulsar 150, equipped with Nitrox suspension, has a more adjustable setup, allowing you to set the amount of softness or stiffness according to your preference. The front suspension of the Pulsar 150 is also very good. These features significantly enhance the comfort and reliability of the ride.

Conclusion: Pulsar 150 as the Better Choice

While the Apache RTR 160 offers a powerful and sporty look, it may not be the best choice if your primary focus is on comfort, reliability, and efficient city driving. My recommendation, based on a thorough comparison, is to opt for the Pulsar 150. Spending a significant amount of money solely for extra power, speed, and a sporty appearance might not be the best investment if you value a bike that is more comfortable and reliable. The Pulsar 150 provides a more balanced and satisfying riding experience, making it a superior choice for the long term.

Final Thoughts

When it comes to choosing between the Apache RTR 160 and the Pulsar 150, the Pulsar 150 stands out due to its superior handling in city traffic, smoother gear shifting, and significantly better suspension. While the Apache RTR 160 excels in sporty performance, the Pulsar 150 offers a more comfortable and reliable ride, making it the better overall choice for a wide range of riders.