Does a Catalytic Converter Reduce Fuel Consumption?
No, it's not true at all. Catalytic converters are not designed to reduce fuel consumption; instead, they waste or chemically burn off a significant amount of partially burned fuel that should have been burned properly within the engine. The primary purpose of a catalytic converter is to clean up the harmful emissions produced by faulty combustion within the engine. Faulty combustion of a sprayed mix of gaseous and liquid fuel droplets is the root cause of poor fuel economy, excessive CO2 production, and soot contamination of the combustion chamber and engine oil.
The Myths Surrounding Catalytic Converters
Some people believe that a catalytic converter can reduce fuel consumption if it is plugged and filled with carbon or other materials. However, this belief is based on misconceptions. Catalytic converters are installed to chemically convert partially unburnt exhaust byproducts into less harmful substances. They do not fix the faulty combustion occurring within the engine; instead, they inadvertently waste fuel by processing emissions that should be completely burned in the engine.
Causes of Faulty Combustion and Fuel Economy Issues
Spraying wet fuel into a car engine is the direct cause of faulty combustion, leading to poor fuel economy and engine oil contamination with soot. Wet fuel burns too slowly and can be prone to knocking due to the incompressible liquid component. To compensate for this, the fuel injection and ignition timing systems become overcomplicated, which can lead to issues with fuel efficiency and performance. Properly gasified fuel, on the other hand, would burn much faster and more consistently, eliminating the need for such complex controls.
The Suppressed Knowledge About Gasified Fuel
The scientific understanding that properly gasified fuel burns superbly and produces a consistent blue flame is over a century old. This knowledge has been highly suppressed, and its practical application has been hindered. High-speed photography has confirmed that gasified fuel burns consistently and efficiently, as opposed to the variable and often incomplete combustion processes that result from wet fuel spraying.
If gasoline were admitted as a pre-dried hydrocarbon gas fuel, fuel economy would improve significantly. Toxic exhaust emissions would decrease, and CO2 output would diminish. Engine oil would remain cleaner, and the need for highly complex ignition and fuel injection systems would be eliminated. High-speed photography further supports the idea that pre-dried gaseous fuel burns much faster and does not suffer from knocking, achieving a much higher air-to-gaseous fuel ratio than the usual 14.7:1 ratio required for wet burning fuel.
Gasifier Carburetors and Their Suppression
Historically, high-mileage gasifier carburetors did exist and worked very well. However, the fossil fuel industry added additives to fuel specifically to clog up gasifier heat exchangers. This suppression of this technology has likely contributed to the continued reliance on inefficiencies due to wet fuel combustion.
The information presented here suggests that the true solution to improving fuel economy and reducing emissions lies in understanding and applying the science of properly gasified fuel. By removing the wet component from the fuel delivery system, the engine can achieve more efficient combustion, leading to better performance and reduced environmental impact.