Are There Any Rules in Motorsport That Prevent the Usage of Hand Controls?
Motor sports, from IndyCar to Formula 1, are governed by a network of detailed technical regulations designed to ensure a level playing field and driver safety. However, these rules sometimes face challenges when it comes to accommodating drivers with disabilities, such as the case of Billy Monger. This article explores the current rules and regulations related to the usage of hand controls in motorsports and highlights the human story behind these regulations.
The Current Regulations
The Technical Regulations of motor sports, including those governing IndyCar and Formula 1, contain specific guidelines regarding the controls a driver may use. For instance, Regulation 5.6.1 clearly states: 'The only means by which the driver may control acceleration torque to the driven wheels is via a single foot accelerator pedal mounted inside the survival cell.' This regulation is designed to focus the driver's attention and ensure safety by limiting the number of controls within the car. As a result, the answer to the question is technically ‘yes’—drivers are not allowed to use hand controls for throttle or brake controls.
Breaking the Rules with Billy Monger
Billy Monger is a name that stands out as a testament to human perseverance and the push for inclusion in motor sports. Monger was a promising driver on the Junior Formula ladder before facing a life-altering challenge. In 2017, he was involved in a horrific crash during an F4 race that required the amputation of his legs to save his life. Despite this tragedy, Monger's determination to continue racing was unwavering.
His journey back into racing in 2018 with British F3 was nothing short of extraordinary. Monger used an 'appropriately modified' F3 car equipped with hand controls, which he operated from behind the wheel. This move was not just personal; it was also a significant milestone for motor sports. The rules at the time did not allow drivers with such disabilities to compete, but Monger's family had to directly appeal to the FIA (Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile) to amend the regulations. The FIA eventually agreed, permitting drivers with disabilities like Monger's to compete, provided they could pass the same extraction tests as other drivers. These tests involve the ability to exit the car within approximately four seconds after removing the seatbelt.
Potential Future Regulations
The story of Billy Monger raises important questions about the future of motor sports regulations and the inclusion of drivers with disabilities. If Monger had managed to progress to Formula 1, it is highly likely that the FIA would have made similar amendments to the technical regulations. This scenario highlights the need for motor sports organizations to be flexible and accommodating to all, ensuring that talented drivers can compete regardless of physical limitations.
Conclusion
While current regulations in motorsports do not explicitly allow the use of hand controls for throttle or brake, the case of Billy Monger demonstrates the importance of adaptability and inclusivity. The FIA's decision to accommodate Monger sets a precedent for future rule changes that could help other drivers with disabilities compete at the highest levels. As motor sports continue to evolve, we can expect even more innovative solutions that balance safety, performance, and the pursuit of equality.