The Truth Behind Universal Background Checks and Gun Control
It's a common misconception that ownership of firearms and support for gun control are always mutually exclusive. Many individuals own firearms and can still be vocal supporters of reasonable gun control measures. However, it's crucial to understand the reality of current gun control proposals and their effectiveness.
Universal Background Checks: Effective or Misunderstood?
One of the most heavily debated topics in modern gun control discussions is Universal Background Checks (UBCs). Despite being a central proposal, the effectiveness of UBCs is often misunderstood. In my state of Pennsylvania, we have had UBCs for handguns for over 85 years, well before federal laws were implemented.
During these decades, UBCs have significantly increased the requirements, costs, and liabilities associated with legal firearm transfers. However, the common belief that these checks would dramatically reduce gun-related crimes is not entirely accurate. In fact, the most common firearm used in the commission of a crime is still an illegally possessed handgun.
Futhermore, the majority of illegally possessed handguns in Philadelphia are originally purchased in Pennsylvania, rather than 'out of state'. A recent survey by local police found that over 90% of recovered illegal firearms had been purchased within the state.
The Root of the Problem
While UBCs have a place in gun control measures, they are not the complete solution. The root of the problem lies with individuals who commit criminal actions with firearms. It's important to acknowledge that the issue is not the availability of firearms but rather the actions of those who misuse them.
Making harsher punishments for firearms-related crimes could be a more effective and humane solution. The focus should be on addressing the individuals engaging in criminal activities with firearms. Rather than prolonging debates on procedural measures, what is needed are stricter penalties for those convicted of violent crimes involving firearms.
A Call for Action
Is it time to raise the stakes by making certain firearms-related crimes capital offenses? A strong argument can be made that in cases where a firearm is used to commit a violent crime resulting in a fatality, the perpetrator should face the harshest penalties, including the death penalty when such acts lead to irreversible outcomes.
It is important to consider that not all offenders fit into a single category. From those who are mentally ill, to those driven by pure malice, we must address these issues with a comprehensive and targeted approach.
Universal background checks are not the ultimate answer. We need a multifaceted strategy that includes stronger penalties, mental health support, and community programs to address the underlying causes of gun violence. It's time for a genuine and honest discussion about the root causes and effective solutions.